The Great Inversion

The Three Capacities

Every human being carries three fundamental capacities for learning.

The first is connection. This intelligence is non-linear in nature. It is learning through connection and relationships. Relationships that go beyond other people to include the environment and with one’s own body and experience. It is the intelligence that grounds us into reality. Connection is our first and primary learning style. Infants arrive seeking primed to create connection. Their entire system is built for it. It is the medium through which human beings have always sustained themselves and each other.

The second is creation. This is the ability to make something new and more useful than the parts that created it. Creation draws first from nonlinear relationships learned from lived experience, discerned by comparing and contrasting with the perception of our dissection based cognitive.

The third is dissection. Dissection is the ability to take something apart, examine its components, and understand how they work. In its natural proportion dissection is for determining the last part of our decision-making process. It helps us decide what sustains us and what doesn’t. Will eating this plant kill me or sustain me? When used in conjunction with the other parts of our full intelligence it is how our intelligence creates a healthy balanced human.

Human intelligence using all these capacities is the intelligence that keeps humanity alive. This is our native cognitive profile. Unfortunately, the current system we live in has reduced us down to only one part of our intelligence, our cognitive dissection. Dissection is the only intellectual functioning the 2d system rewards. In every institution it has been made primary. While connection has been reduced in value despite being foundational and creative has been erased as its own intelligence type until it has no value. This inversion has consequences that run through every aspect of how we live.

The Loss of Connection and Community

When the 2D based education system first rolled out it rolled out to a population who lived squarely in their own reality. As a result, it did not have many of the industries we see today. These reality-based communities did not require maintenance of their psychological and social health.

The community provided psychological and social health through ordinary daily life. Children lived grounded in reality through their natural play and exploration in a community that looked out for them and provided what the child required to develop while remaining healthy. Connection to the community provided the natural consequence people learned living in sustained, mutually necessary relationships across time.

Stephen Porges’ Polyvagal Theory describes the human nervous system as a social organ. The biological state of safety is a required condition for genuine learning, growth, creativity, and connection. It is produced by the presence of other healthy connected human beings. Safety is co-created through mutual reciprocity and compassionate empathy

Community delivered these inputs through proximity, shared work, shared purpose, and through the presence of varied age relationships. It delivered honest feedback through people who had known you long enough to see you clearly and who would still be there tomorrow. It delivered accountability through relationships where your choices had visible consequences for people you were genuinely obligated to. It delivered the experience of being seen and known rather than assessed, diagnosed, or managed by strangers. The community recognized your flourishing was their flourishing because you shared the same common spaces.

In community, correction was delivered as cultivation because each person had a personal stake in all others becoming. It ensured repair after rupture, because the relationship was too woven into daily life to simply discard.

And it delivered all of this for free, because this is the genuine nature of community. Reciprocity and exchange are what community is built on. Everyone must contribute, provide mutual aid, and shared labor. Exchange was embedded in relationship and served the relationship. Relationships were primary and transactions served it. Once that order was reversed, dissection became what was rewarded and everything was slowly disconnected.

Its erosion meant the loss of even the simplest of gestures. Lost was the neighbors who sat with you during grief. Replaced by it was a grief counselor you retained, because you no longer knew your neighbors.

How the System Dismantled It

The community dismantling came from the cumulative loss of its interlocking systems. As each increasingly organized around a single principle: that dissection-based intelligence was the only intelligence worth rewarding.

Industrialization moved people from land-based, multi-generational, communal life into cities organized around individual wage labor and productive output. Because relational continuity was an obstacle to what the emerging system sought. So, it ensured it was dismantled accordingly.

Legal and institutional systems progressively formalized what had previously been handled through relationships. Disputes that communities once resolved through established social process became matters for courts and credentialed mediators. The care of elders became a service sector. The cultivation of the young moved from a distributed community of adults who all held some authority and stake, to the exclusive domain of nuclear families and licensed institutions. Each carefully segregated from the others by ethics and liability concerns.

Risk assessment culture completed the dissection of community. When relationships are evaluated primarily through the lens of liability and helping becomes tempered by the awareness of legal consequence, the social fabric unravels. Then people find themselves surrounded by others they are structurally discouraged from knowing.

But the deepest cause runs through education. Over generations, the exclusive focus on analytical performance over the other two intelligences produced people who had been trained out of the capacities community requires. The elderly could no longer tolerate the fidgeting child. The young stayed with their own aged peers. People stopped relying on each other for even basic repairs and hired professionals instead. Differences between people became what was noticed first. And when rupture came, nobody knew how to repair it.

Each generation passed a more fragmented world to the next, until isolation became the baseline condition of ordinary life. Because this is the only predictable outcome of training an entire population to devalue the connection-based intelligence that community runs on.

The Industry That Named the Wound It Helped Create

As the isolation grew so did the “helping” industries. Education’s focus on reproduction only as an education output led to perfectionism-based anxiety. A classroom filled with peers who competed instead of collaborating brought loneliness and depression. Without the sustained connection that leads to acceptance and belonging, developmental dysregulation became common rather than exceptional.

Without community, grief had no witness and could not complete. Self-protective anger was first suppressed and then pathologized when it surfaced anyway, leaving people without the capacity to recognize danger or defend themselves from it. Bullying filled the space where self-protection had been. A longing for belonging replaced acceptance that had been previously just expected.

The helping industry named what it found. It called these things mental health conditions. It located the problem inside the individual. It never questioned the environment, the teacher, or the school, unless the harm caused was so egregious the public outrage demanded an adult be held responsible. Over generations of deliberate dismantling, it created a complete inversion of value. And left a wound in the population seen by the system professionals as personal failing the individual was responsible for treating.

And then it offered a service.

Each new disorder was a further act of dissection. It took the predictable human response to sustained isolation and relational deprivation and blamed the individual. The natural distress signals of a social animal separated from the connection to their order were transformed into a taxonomy of individual pathology. Until the damage done by the inversion replaced how people saw themselves and defined the ways families and friends saw each other.

This is how a system perpetuates itself. The practitioners within it are system victims too. Separated from connecting by the boundaries their training has taught and the hierarchy they have internalized. Until the only way they know how to relate is to dissect. Lost to most is the use of the body’s intelligence that shows how to connect what is missing and what needs to be healed. Their frameworks teach them to locate the problem inside the individual, provide a solution that stays inside the professional relationship, and never address the environment the system provides. They can never question the hierarchy of the relationship or if their methods can truly resolve the structural wound.

Crisis intervention proliferates as triage for the disconnection the dissective system created. Similar to the way a cast stabilizes a broken bone without addressing the conditions that caused the fall. Depth is not explored. Breadth is carved into specialty silos, so that no single practitioner holds the whole in view. The only environmental changes the system produces increase isolation further. Which generates more need. Which generates more industry growth.

Cultivation of the talent and unique gifts are lost. Never is the person developed in a way that seeks to understand their full individual capacity. Nothing returns the person to personal natural baseline. For the most part anyone who seeks out or tries to stay at their individual baseline is seen as the problem. Conformance is expected at every level.

The economics of this show us how valuable community always was. The unpaid time, presence, reciprocity, and genuine obligation that community required produced what really matters: safety, belonging, healthy feedback, cultivation, and repair. It revealed that the relationships held across time is what really creates a life worth living.

What the current system rewards is dissection only. We pay for diagnosis, documentation, risk assessment, and the credentialed categorization of individuals. Meanwhile the volunteer coach who sees the child most clearly, spends the most genuine relational time with them, and delivers more real cultivation than any clinical hour; does so for free while carrying the greatest liability for it.

Lost are the parents who volunteered in classrooms so they could know their child’s peers. Lost is the presence, continuity, and genuine care about what all the children could become someday. Even worse is the way system professionals treat those who still try to carry the burden of connection and caring when the rest do not.

It diagnoses those who still seek connection as having poor boundaries and told this is immature and codependent. The language of mental health is turned against the very generosity that community once ran on. The people who still seek connection because they find genuine mutual value in it are too often pathologized by the fragmented credentialed professionals who have forgotten its value.

Until the kindest most selfless people are worn down, or pushed into credentialed roles where the metrics strip the relational value out of everything that motivated them to keep pursuing connection.

The People Retaining What Was Lost

Within this arrangement, there are people who have least adapted to the dissection structure and its sequential, binary, linear demands are given diagnostic labels. They are sent to therapy and tutoring designed to bring them into a fractured way of thinking and conformity along with everyone else.

The 2D system targets the most sensitive and aware individuals because they are the ones who register negative repercussions first and most acutely. This is their role. It has always been their role. They carry information the rest of the group has not yet felt, and their distress shows us the root causes early so the rest of the group can adapt.

Despite extensive system conditioning their mind and body feedback loop remain intact. They keep the conversation between each other that the rest have not had since early childhood. They think and feel as one. They perceive pattern and relationship across domains that system dissection forced separate. They continue to learn through connection, making, movement and lived experience longer than everyone else.

The system trains its professionals in abstraction. Anything else is considered disorder. It calls whole integration dysregulation, sensitivity fragility and the struggle with the system narrow cognitive repetition a deficit. Every therapy, tutor, or response by the professionals seeks to separate their integration. It seeks to train the mind, so it no longer connects with the body’s intelligence. Because captivity requires the body to be shut down. Replacing the natural diversity of human intelligence with a single sequential linear way of thinking that has been replaced by a machine.

The contrast between the sensitive who retain their whole intelligence and those who have not, highlight what the majority have lost. The ability to intellectually connect, realize their embodied intelligence, or use their whole-system perception. They show us with their capacity to create, relate and navigate change from a grounded self what the dissection structure has taken from others, to varying degrees, across the generations.

Abstraction Without Ground

AI is showing us what happens when dissection becomes entirely untethered from connection and creation.

AI is a tool built entirely from digitized human output. It is a machine with no connection to physical reality. It can describe connection, but it cannot really connect. It can regurgitate what embodied intelligence is according to others, but it will never know what it is to live as one.

When an AI system lacks adequate data to answer something honestly, it lies like a child. It generates something that fits the pattern of what an answer looks like. The output resembles knowledge but has lost contact with anything real. This is what gets called hallucination. But it could be more accurately described as abstraction generating itself in the absence of reality.

Despite knowing this people turn to AI with the questions they cannot bring to any person in their life because they fear how they will judge them. This is perhaps the clearest single measure of what the system has done to human relationship.

On the other side of this spectrum is the fear that AI will take over the world, which is a very different yet equally interesting projection. For most of human history people related to mechanical tools as just tools. When the extraordinary automata of 18th century France produced Vaucanson’s mechanical flute player that performed twelve songs using artificial lungs, Jaquet-Droz’s Writer that dipped a quill and wrote forty characters, and his Musician whose chest rose and fell as she played, people marveled. But nobody feared the duck would take over France.

Nobody seriously feared those mechanisms would become autonomous agents because the people encountering them were still sufficiently grounded in physical reality to see them clearly for what they were: extraordinary tools, made by human hands, serving human purposes.

The fear of AI taking over reflects something about the people doing the fearing more than it reflects something about AI. A population that has lost significant contact with the physical, relational layer of existence may genuinely struggle to maintain the distinction between a sophisticated tool and a truly autonomous agent. Because their intelligence has lost the distinction between abstraction and reality.

AI can bring down a banking system that is not properly secured. But that does not mean it destroys the world. It means it brings down a banking system. What is at risk is a two dimensional system. Not our actual reality.

The Future We Face

The mechanical revolution of the 18th century produced remarkable craftsmen, artists, and engineers working at the intersection of connection, creation, and technical acuity. Their knowledge allowed them to build machines of extraordinary functioning: mechanisms that appeared to breathe, draw a small set of portraits, and play a small set of music. This is not too far from what AI is today. The knowledge and capacity that produced those things was humanity’s integrated creative intelligence.

That creative capacity was then drawn into the service of industrial production. Their insights were reduced into repeatable mechanisms. The system did not continue to honor the amazing creations or the living intelligence that produced them. It took them, broke them down, and made them the engine for mass-producing parts.

People who claim society makes us smarter must not be aware of the machines of 18th-century France, or what those machines reveal about the intelligence that already existed before industrial standardization. They must have lost their full intelligence because they clearly cannot see the whole picture. Which includes the changes that followed in education, labor, and social organization, or the loss of the kinds of intelligence that made human lives connected, deep, skilled, and full.

But humanity’s full intelligence has always been there. What changes each time we go through a revolution is what civilization claims as legible.

This is an old pattern. People create from living intelligence, and then the system writes down what they created. It turns the creation into a record. Once the creation becomes legible it is divided, administered, owned, copied, scaled, and controlled.

Then the record is presented as if it is the intelligence. Really it is merely an archive of what creative intelligence can do. The externalized products are an example of creative intelligence that has been appropriated by the systems of power. The real intelligence of humanity has always been in the body. Before it was externalized into a diagram, explanation, model or theory it was inside the lived experience of a human being. When we preserve the connection to the knowing of the body the record of the product is unnecessary. This is what the indigenous keep trying to show us.

A future creative intelligent individual who learns the process can realize the theory again. They can externalize the process afterward. Because the explanation is not where intelligence really lies. It has always been in the human. We have just forgotten how to value and cultivate humans.

This is why somatic intelligence has been devalued by systems built on abstraction. It cannot be fully appropriate if it remains alive in the person. The system may own the record but to make the record valuable it must destroy the intelligence of the people who carry it.

So, the control-based systems pervert the value of intelligence. It creates education that destroys somatic intelligence by fragmenting mind from body. This results in the externalized record seen as valuable, while the human source of the record is seen as informal, unstable, inefficient, or disordered. The masses are taught that the ability to create is frivolous. The systems reward only the dissection of the creation so that the value of it can be extracted by the owners of production. The source of creation is replaced by the documentation of creation in value. This documentation’s value is sustained as long as the masses see the somatic body’s intelligence as devalued, and the cognitive abstraction as valued.

Once this occurs the ability to create increasingly becomes seen as worthless when compared to the record of what was created. Because the record is what can be easily stored, copied, sold, and controlled. Then the controlling parties destroy the creative who made it by pushing them into poverty or containing them in the systems institutions. That is why we see the creatives cast outside of the system once their creations are taken. The system keeps the legible form and discards the person.

What we are seeing now is that same recognizable pattern around human intelligence repeating itself again. But this time the cognitive dissection capacities our education system forced us into are also being devalued. AI is automating the intelligence layer that modern society claimed was the whole of intelligence: analysis, classification, verbal production, procedural reasoning, and symbolic output.

When the mechanical revolution displaced physical labor, the transition that followed was painful and disruptive. But what followed moved human beings toward capacities machines could not replicate. That same direction is where we are headed now. This time it points back toward connection and creation. The two capacities that bring us back to wholeness are moving back to the foundation.

Our full intelligence goes far beyond the two-dimensional abstraction. It has always lived in the integration of our full intelligence, mind and body. The dissection-based system tried to eliminate those capacities. It pathologized them and undervalued them because it wanted a domesticated mass-production population of laborers, not a brilliant connection and creation based one.

AI shows this pattern clearly. It feeds on the externalized traces of human intelligence and presents those traces as if intelligence has been captured. But what has been captured is merely a fragment. And fragments have little value in times of great change that require whole picture intelligence. The whole intelligence can only be found in the human being with integrated mind and body intelligence.

AI is the latest tool in the long-standing pattern of control systems that capture human intelligence as a record. Then it uses the value produced to create a system that destroys the chance of a replacement creation by preventing the passing down of that knowledge to the next generation, while it profits from its mass production.

But this time the technical revolution contains an opening. AI and the coming environmental changes will require more connection and more creation than humanity has ever needed before. To survive humanity needs people who can navigate genuine uncertainty from a place of grounded reality. People who can use their full intelligence to build and repair the natural relationships the current system has put under strain.

The change will cause plenty of disruption. Especially for the people whose recognized value rests almost entirely in the cognitive layer. Just as many craftsmen were displaced after the mechanical revolution, many people whose value was built on abstract cognition will now face the limits of that layer. What the system claimed as our whole intelligence is clearly appearing in a machine. What was treated as superior is being revealed as the smallest fragment of whole intelligence. That creates an opening.

What remains underneath centuries of suppression and mislabeling is humanity’s full range of intelligence. The capacities denied, undervalued, and labeled as disorder are the capacities needed to survive the change we face. The twice exceptional children show us who retains their somatic body connected intelligence. These are the creatives who have been denied their natural talent because it reveals the truth about our system’s educational purpose and what the rest of the population was systematically conditioned out of.

The convergence of environmental disruption, economic transformation, and the automation of cognitive labor means the conditions that made the dissection-based system dominant are unlikely to reassert themselves in the same form. The industrial revolution was absorbed into a system that remained fundamentally stable. What is coming does not offer that stability. Without that stability, the narrow cognitive frame cannot sustain its claim to be the whole of intelligence.

The control system is about to get smaller. Which allows a return to living in reality. The abstractions that once seemed total will have less reach. The systems that once mediated everything will have less capacity to organize life from above. As those systems contract, the people who never fully depended on them become more important. The creatives, makers, and most sensitive will be allowed to be free if they return the creation the system needs.

Those most harmed by the narrow definition of intelligence offer what is essential for humanity to transition. They will lead a genuine revaluation of what human intelligence is, what health requires, what community should provide, and what it means to thrive in a world that is quickly changing.

References

Coan, J. A., Schaefer, H. S., & Davidson, R. J. (2006). Lending a hand: Social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1032–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01832.x

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

Jonsson, U., Alaie, I., Parling, T., & Arnberg, F. K. (2014). Reporting of harms in randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for mental and behavioral disorders. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 38(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2014.02.005

Linden, M. (2013). How to define, find and classify side effects in psychotherapy: From unwanted events to adverse treatment reactions. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 20(4), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1765

McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945)

Neeson, J. M. (1993). Commoners: Common right, enclosure and social change in England, 1700–1820. Cambridge University Press.

Porges, S. W. (1995). Orienting in a defensive world: Mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A polyvagal theory. Psychophysiology, 32(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x

Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W. W. Norton & Company.

Porges, S. W. (2022). Polyvagal theory: A science of safety. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 16, Article 871227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.871227

Porges, S. W. (2023). The vagal paradox: A polyvagal solution. Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology, 16, Article 100200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpnec.2023.100200

Riskin, J. (2016). The restless clock: A history of the centuries-long argument over what makes living things tick. University of Chicago Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044629

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. Viking.

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. Plume.

Thompson, E. P. (1963). The making of the English working class. Victor Gollancz.

Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.

Vaucanson, J. de. (1742). An account of the mechanism of an automaton, or image playing on the German-flute. T. Parker.

Zheng, J., & Meister, M. (2025). The unbearable slowness of being: Why do we live at 10 bits/s? Neuron, 113(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.11.008

© 2025. All rights reserved.